Asger Risom
A Latvian lawmaker says Putin’s death could shake the regime — but warns his inner circle may be even more dangerous.
A Latvian lawmaker says Putin’s death could shake the regime — but warns his inner circle may be even more dangerous.
A Political Earthquake — But Not an End
Latvian MEP Ivars Ijabs has warned that while Vladimir Putin’s death would be a major turning point for Russia, it would not necessarily end the Kremlin’s aggression.
“Preferably a Biological Exit”
Ijabs suggested that long-term peace in Ukraine might only be possible after Putin’s departure — and didn’t shy away from stating his preferred scenario.
A Warning Against Naivety
Despite many hoping for change, Ijabs urged the West to stay realistic about what a post-Putin Russia might look like.
No Way Around Putin — For Now
According to Ijabs, as long as Putin is alive and in power, Russia’s political system will remain locked in place.
Peace Talks Have Failed
Recent rounds of peace negotiations — like those in Istanbul — have failed to yield real results. Ukraine has called for a full ceasefire, the return of prisoners and deported children, and a Zelensky-Putin summit. Russia has not responded.
Ukraine’s Demands Remain Clear
Ukraine’s foreign ministry reiterated its firm position going into the Istanbul talks:
- Full ceasefire
- Return of POWs and deported children
- Direct negotiations between leaders
A Dangerous Void
While Putin’s death might open the door to change, it could also unleash deeper instability if more radical figures take control.
The West’s Dilemma
Ijabs’ comments highlight a growing concern in Europe — that Putin’s exit won’t be enough unless Russia’s entire power structure changes.
What Comes Next?
Without reforms or real opposition, a post-Putin Russia may remain just as aggressive — or worse.
A Stark Outlook
Ijabs’ grim conclusion? Real peace may only come once the system built by Putin is dismantled — not just the man himself.