A similar deal has been tried and tested between the US and Belarus.
An envoy for Donald Trump recently pitched a bold idea to ease tensions with Moscow. The plan suggests dropping some United States economic sanctions if the Kremlin agrees to release political prisoners.
According to The Atlantic, this initiative hopes to open the door for lucrative global business deals involving Russian oil, diesel, and rare earth minerals. The American leadership reportedly signed off on the controversial approach.
John Coale is the special envoy behind the strategy. He genuinely believes that building strong financial relationships can slowly help end the bitter, long-running war in Ukraine.
“Economic ties usually result in normality,” Coale told the magazine during a recent interview.
The business of peace
The concept has already seen a trial run in Belarus. Working with the local regime, the American team secured the release of hundreds of inmates. To reward this move, Washington rolled back strict penalties and advanced a massive agricultural fertilizer deal.
Trump recently announced a massive fertilizer trade with the Belarusian government. Coale confirmed to The Atlantic that Russia is actively involved in those ongoing talks.
The former lawyer sees these uncomfortable diplomatic compromises as a vital stepping stone toward global stability.
“All this stuff works toward the possibility of peace,” Coale told the publication. “The more interaction, the more trade-offs, either economic, prisoners, or whatever, leads step by step toward, hopefully, peace. That’s kind of the mission.”
Kremlin reacts
Moscow has quickly shut down the potential bargain with Washington.
According to The Moscow Times, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov rejected the entire premise during a daily press briefing on Wednesday.
No such conversation ever took place between the two governments, he insisted.
“In this formulation, the issue was not discussed and could not be discussed because we categorically deny the existence of any political prisoners,” Peskov said.
He added that framing the matter this way was “completely inappropriate.”