Homepage News Russia’s war voices spark WW3 fears with nuclear talk

Russia’s war voices spark WW3 fears with nuclear talk

Putin
Photoibo / Shutterstock.com

Fresh Russian attacks on Ukraine’s energy system have plunged millions into darkness and cold, setting the backdrop for a surge in aggressive rhetoric from Moscow aimed at the West.

Others are reading now

The threats, voiced by Kremlin-aligned figures rather than President Vladimir Putin himself, have raised concerns about further escalation involving the UK and its allies.

Winter pressure

Ukraine’s energy ministry said Russian forces launched another wave of strikes against power infrastructure, leaving large parts of the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia regions without electricity.

Critical facilities were forced onto backup power, while heating, lighting and water supplies were disrupted as temperatures hovered just above freezing. More than one million people were reported to be without electricity, with transport and hospital services affected.

The attacks were seen as part of a broader campaign targeting civilian infrastructure during winter.

Rising rhetoric

As the strikes unfolded, hostile language intensified inside Russia. Multiple lawmakers and pro-Kremlin commentators publicly demanded retaliation against Western countries, with some openly discussing the use of nuclear weapons.

Also read

One senior figure warned that “there is no doubt that the response must be firm and swift,” adding that Russia’s military doctrine allowed for extreme measures. Others argued that only harsh action would deter further Western moves.

The comments were widely circulated on state-aligned media and messaging platforms, according to the Daily Express.

Maritime dispute

The rhetoric followed a joint US-UK operation to seize the Marinera oil tanker in the North Atlantic, an action Moscow had warned against.

Russian voices described the seizure as an act of piracy and a national humiliation, arguing it crossed a red line. The incident was portrayed as evidence that the West believed it could act without consequence.

While the Kremlin did not immediately issue a formal response, the episode became a rallying point for calls for retaliation.

Also read

Calls for escalation

Some commentators suggested targeting Western shipping or imposing sweeping measures against vessels linked to Ukraine. Others went further, floating the idea of strikes on Western arms production facilities.

Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, now deputy head of Russia’s security council, issued a blunt message to Washington: “Don’t play games with Russia.”

Pro-Kremlin channels also criticised Moscow’s response as too restrained, urging more forceful action.

Putin absent

President Vladimir Putin remained largely out of public view in the aftermath of the tanker seizure, appearing only briefly this year at an Orthodox Christmas service.

His absence did little to calm speculation, as the combination of winter strikes and nuclear rhetoric continued to stoke fears of a wider confrontation involving NATO countries, including the UK.

Also read

Sources: Daily Express, Ukrainian Energy Ministry

Ads by MGDK