A legal dispute over the sale of Amy Winehouse’s personal items has been resolved in the High Court.
The case centred on claims that people close to the late singer profited from her possessions without permission, reports Sky News.
Court ruling delivered
Amy Winehouse’s father, Mitch Winehouse, has lost his legal challenge against two of the singer’s friends.
According to Sky News, the case involved claims that stylist Naomi Parry and friend Catriona Gourlay sold items linked to the late artist without informing the estate.
Mr Winehouse, acting as administrator, had sought significant damages over auctions held in 2021 and 2023.
However, the court ruled in favour of the defendants.
Ownership dispute
The case focused on whether the items sold had been improperly retained.
According to Sky News, the two women argued that the belongings were either gifts from Winehouse or already belonged to them.
Judge Sarah Clarke KC said there was no evidence they had deliberately hidden items from the estate.
“I find that neither Ms Parry nor Ms Gourlay deliberately concealed any of their disputed items from the claimant,” she said.
Arguments in court
During proceedings, tensions emerged over motives behind the claim.
According to Sky News, lawyers for Ms Parry suggested the case was driven by “petty jealousy”, an accusation Mr Winehouse rejected.
The court also heard details of a major auction featuring hundreds of items linked to the singer.
One sale reportedly raised $1.4m, with a portion going to the Amy Winehouse Foundation.
Judge’s assessment
The ruling acknowledged both personal and financial aspects of the dispute.
“It is also the case that Amy’s estate, including in particular the royalties from Back To Black, has made Mr Winehouse personally extremely wealthy,” the judge said.
She added that he was “understandably sensitive” about how his daughter’s legacy is used.
The court concluded that he could have identified the items earlier with reasonable effort.
Reaction to verdict
Naomi Parry welcomed the outcome following the decision.
According to Sky News, she said the ruling cleared her name after years of allegations.
“I stood beside Amy as a friend, a creative partner, and her costume designer,” she said.
The case brings an end to a dispute over the handling of belongings tied to one of the UK’s most influential modern artists.
Sources: Sky News