Camilla Jessen
Why Buckingham Palace is not fit for a king.
Buckingham Palace may be the crown jewel of royal tradition, but it’s far from anyone’s dream home, especially not King Charles or Prince William.
Here’s why they’re choosing to live elsewhere.
The Palace of Tradition — But Not of Comfort
Buckingham Palace may be the most recognizable royal residence in the world, but for the royal family, it has never truly felt like home.
While it continues to serve as the symbolic heart of the British monarchy—with balcony appearances, state banquets, and wedding receptions—it remains, in reality, a cold and impractical place to live.
Mice in the Kitchen
The palace’s issues are long-standing and well-documented.
In 2001, mice were found in Queen Elizabeth’s kitchen. The royal household attempted to downplay the incident by claiming there were “very small numbers.”
Former U.S. President Barack Obama even reportedly had an awkward encounter with one of the critters during an official visit.
Crumpling Structure
Worse still, in 2007, a chunk of masonry fell from the palace facade, narrowly missing Princess Anne.
The aging structure has also faced problems with asbestos, leaky roofs, and outdated wiring, all of which have raised serious safety concerns over the years.
“Living Above Your Own Shop”
Originally built in the 1700s and converted into a royal residence in 1837 under Queen Victoria, Buckingham Palace has long been considered by insiders as inhospitable and unfit for modern life.
Royal commentator Giselle Bastin once likened it to “living above your own shop.”
King Charles Prefers Comfort and Sustainability
King Charles has never hidden his feelings about “the big house,” as he reportedly calls it.
Even before becoming king, he was eyeing Windsor Castle as a more fitting long-term residence. Since his coronation, he has continued to live at Clarence House and has shown little interest in making Buckingham Palace his home.
Sources say his concerns are not just about comfort but also about financial and environmental sustainability.
Persuaded by Winston Churchill
According to ABCnet, the late Queen Elizabeth was persuaded by then-Prime Minister Winston Churchill to take up residence at the palace.
But unlike his mother, Charles has both the seniority and resolve to stand firm on the matter.
A New Generation, a new approach
Prince William and Princess Kate are following a similar path.
Rather than settling into the palace, they’ve chosen Forest Lodge in Windsor Great Park as their “forever home.”
It’s a deliberate choice that reflects their desire for a more private, grounded family life for Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis.
A Royal Backdrop
While Buckingham Palace will continue to serve as a majestic backdrop for royal pageantry, its role is becoming increasingly ceremonial rather than residential.
Tradition Gives Way to Practicality
The decision not to live at Buckingham Palace may disappoint royal purists, but it reflects the evolving nature of the monarchy.
Charles and William are prioritizing modern family values, personal comfort, and long-term sustainability over outdated expectations.
