Princess Amalia of the Netherlands Revisits Royal Allowance Decision

Written by Henrik Rothen

May.11 - 2024 8:33 AM CET

Photo: Keld Navntoft, Kongehuset © (Princess Amalie, Right)
Photo: Keld Navntoft, Kongehuset © (Princess Amalie, Right)
Princess Amalia reconsiders her stance on royal financial support as she prepares to take on full-time royal duties.

Trending Now

Just a few years ago, Princess Amalia of the Netherlands made headlines for a personal letter she wrote to the Prime Minister, renouncing her right to receive the financial support traditionally granted to the heir to the throne.

Citing discomfort with the stipend during a time when students across the globe were struggling amidst the coronavirus pandemic, her gesture was widely praised as an act of empathy and maturity.

Now, as she nears the completion of her studies, her circumstances—and stance—are changing. This is reported by Norwegian

A Shift Towards Increased Royal Responsibilities

The Princess's recent letter to the Prime Minister marks a pivotal shift.

In it, she expresses her desire to begin receiving a portion of the allowance previously declined, specifically to cover expenses directly related to her official royal duties.

This request, totaling an estimated 1.5 million euros annually, aims to fund staff costs, material needs, and other expenses incurred in the course of her duties.

Balancing Public Sensitivity with Royal Duty

The Dutch Royal House has confirmed Amalia's intention to take on a more significant role within the monarchy, reflecting her readiness to embrace the responsibilities that come with her position.

This move comes as she transitions from student life to full-time engagement in royal obligations.

By only requesting funds for official expenses, she continues to demonstrate a conscientious approach to her public role and the privileges that accompany it.

Her decision to accept part of her allowance aligns with her evolving role and the associated costs of serving as a public figure, ensuring that her activities do not impose undue burden on the state's finances.

Most Read